Full Text Article Open Access
Citation: Abid H, Ben Maatoug A, Nefiss M, Tborbi A, Ezzaouia K, Bouzidi R. Masquelet's induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone
hydatid disease.Jr.med.res.2021;4(1): 21-23. Abid et al © All rights are reserved. https://doi.org/10.32512/jmr.3.2.2020/21.23
Submit your manuscript: www.jmedicalresearch.com
Images in clinical practice
Abid Hichem
1,2, *
, Ben Maatoug Aymen
1,2
, Nefiss Mouadh
1,2
, Tborbi Anis
1,2
, Ezzaouia Khlil
1,2
, Bouzidi Ramzi
1,2
.
Masquelet's induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone hydatid disease.
1: Department of Orthopedics, Mongi
Slim Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
2: college of medicine, Tunis Tunisia
* Corresponding author
Correspondence to:
hich.abid2112@gmail.com
Publication Data:
Submitted: February 21,2021
Accepted: April 22,2021
Online: May 30,2021
This article was subject to full
peer-review.
This is an open access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0
(CCBY-NC) allowing sharing and adapting.
Share: copy and redistribute the material in
any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the
licensed material.
The work provided must be properly cited
and cannot be used for commercial purpose.
Bone Hydatid disease is a rare entity even in endemic areas. Insidious symptoms onset is
due to progressive infiltration of the parasite into bony tissues. The frequent pseudo-tumoral
presentation of bone parasitosis made its surgical treatment closer to carcinologic
procedures. We report a case of hydatid disease of the femur managed in two-steps induced
membrane surgical technique.
Keywords:
Hydatid cyst; femur; surgical technique.
Introduction
Bone echinococcosis represents only 0.5 to 3% of all hydatid cyst’s locations [1]. This
parasitosis is usually initially asymptomatic. The natural evolution of the parasite is
insidious in such hostile location. The diagnosis is almost always delayed and made
when the lesions are already locally advanced [2]. The aim of this report was to
highlight the pathological characteristics an extended parasitosis of the femur and the
challenging surgical management.
Observation
We present the case of a 57-year-old male, who presented with spontaneous oozing
fistula of the lateral side of the right thigh. On his history, we noted a previous incision
and drainage of abscess in the right thigh one year ago. No germs were identified in
the swab. He consulted us for recurrence of pain, swelling and persistent discharge.
On the examination, Hip and knee range of motion were within normal. The external
fistula orifice was in the distal corner of the previous surgery scar with serous liquid
discharge. There were no inflammatory signs.
Femur X-rays showed multilocular lesion of the diaphysis with cortical deformation.
These characteristics were confirmed by hip MRI scan (Figure 1). Tru-cut biopsy of the
mass confirmed its parasitological origin. Chest and abdomen were free of cyst on the
computed tomography (CT) scans. The diagnosis of peripheral bone echinococcosis
affecting the femur was retained and surgery was indicated.
The plan was to perform a segmental femoral resection excising the lesion and the
surrounding invaded soft tissues; followed by a two-step reconstruction according to
the induced membrane technique. Resection of infected bone and adjacent soft
invaded tissues was performed through femur lateral approach. The surgical site was
abundantly washed with hypertonic saline solution. Bone fixation was performed with
gamma nail. The substance defect was replaced by bone cement (figure 2).
Post-operative course was uneventful and pathological examination of the resected
specimen confirmed the diagnosis of echinococcosis. The patient started oral
antiparasitic treatment course. Six weeks later, he was scheduled for the next
procedure step. Bone cement was removed and replaced by bone autograft from fibula,
anterior and posterior iliac crests. At Twenty months of follow-up, the patient had no
complaints with normal right hip and knee range of motion. X-rays showed satisfactory
evolution (figure 3).
Masquelet's induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone hydatid disease
Citation: Abid H, Ben Maatoug A, Nefiss M, Tborbi A, Ezzaouia K, Bouzidi R Masquelet's induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone
hydatid disease.Jr.med.res.2021;4(1): 21-23. Abid et al © All rights are reserved.
Submit your manuscript: www.jmedicalresearch.com.
22
Figure 1: Plain roentgenogram showing proximal right femur cystic pseudo tumoral mass deforming the cortex.
Figure 2: Intraoperative aspect of the femoral mass.
a b
Figure 3: post-operative follow-up X-rays
a: after first procedure
b: after second procedure
Masquelet's induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone hydatid disease
Citation: Abid H, Ben Maatoug A, Nefiss M, Tborbi A, Ezzaouia K, Bouzidi R Masquelet's induced membrane technique for the treatment of bone
hydatid disease.Jr.med.res.2021;4(1): 21-23. Abid et al © All rights are reserved.
Submit your manuscript: www.jmedicalresearch.com.
Discussion
Masquelet's induced membrane technique is a two-stage procedure described first for the reconstruction of long
segmental bone defects [1]. The first stage requires radical excision and debridement of all devitalized tissues. The
bone defect can be replaced temporarily and fixed internally or externally. The foreign-body immune response
created after the first stage is crucial for the success of the second step [2]. Healthy and well supplied tissues kept
in the first stage will contribute to the formation of vascularized induced membrane and produces multiple growth
factors. This membrane will support bone grafting and accelerate the healing [3]. Masquelet's technique is simple,
effective and reproducible technique for the treatment of several bone diseases such as infection, tumors or
complex traumatism [4]. This technique allowed us to control the hydatid disease in one of its rarest presentation.
23
Conflict of Interest: None
References
[1] Masquelet AC. The induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Sep; 106:785-87.
[2] Fung B, Hoit G, Schemitsch E, Godbout C, Nauth A. The induced membrane technique for the management of long bone defects. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B:1723-34.
[3] Pereira R, Perry WC, Crisologo PA, Liette MD, Hall B, Hafez Hassn SG, et al. Membrane-Induced technique for the management of combined soft tissue and osseous
defects. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2021; 38:99-110.
[4] Andrzejowski P, Masquelet A, Giannoudis PV. Induced membrane technique (Masquelet) for bone defects in the distal Tibia, foot, and ankle: Systematic review, case
presentations, tips, and techniques. Foot Ankle Clin. 2020; 25:537-86.